Columnist Jamala Rogers

To the tune of “The Cupid Shuffle”:

“To the right, to the right, to the right, to the right, to the right

Now kick ‘em in the butt, kick ‘em in the butt.”

The crises in public education have created a diseased gene pool of superintendents who go from urban district to district. They have the school reform jargon down pat, promising fiscal accountability and higher reading scores.

I ask you: if they knew how to do that successfully, would they be on the market so often?

Take Creg Williams and Rudy Crews, for instance, described by one local reporter as “hired guns to blow up the district.” We have Brooks Brothers Bill Roberti, Mayor Slay and his posse to thank for them. Since getting the boot out of the Lou, Williams has bounced around several cities. Crews has bounced in several districts. Cha-ching, cha-ching.

Rudy Crews, a Roberti “consultant” here, went on to Miami and became the highest paid superintendent in the country. Community leaders there even chipped in to buy his house.

That little romance soured quickly. Crews abused his powers. He used the proverbial cloak to hide his shenanigans and refused to cooperate with requests for transparency. The computer software firm where his son works gut the big hook-up for a multi-million contract. Crews left with a severance pay of $368,000.

That’s the ugliest part of the hustle. Financially strapped districts have to buy these hustlers’ contracts out and still pay for a new superintendent. It is the worse form of exploitation. It means that district jobs have to be cut or schools closed to make up the difference. These hustlers almost always leave the district in worse shape than when they came.

St. Louis is looking at three bouncers for the next superintendent of its troubled district. I don’t know if they fit the criteria of being in the diseased pool, but I certainly see some running sores that don’t look healthy.

Kelvin Adams first came with Creg Williams. That association alone makes him suspect, since Williams’ signature was bringing his incompetent friends into St. Louis for jobs. A source close to the situation says that district employees who had to work with Adams cringe at the thought of him becoming head honcho. Like Roberti and Williams before him, he has no experiences as a superintendent.

Eric Becoats was the former co-interim superintendent of a district in North Carolina. Does that term mean that he was one of two temps the district wouldn’t hire as permanent? Becoats has admitted using bad judgment when he ran his private consulting firm out of one of the schools in another district where he was associate super. Did I mention he hired his wife for an administrative position in the Guilford County school district?

Donnie Evans is best known for a blunder that left students in 60 busses stranded for hours into the night during a December snowstorm. Evans was supposed to be the one to stop the revolving door of superintendents in Providence, R.I. But alas, just like his predecessors, he barely got his three years in. Evans also has been criticized for lack of communication with parents and the public. Teachers cited a number of issues, such as lack of accountability and a clear direction. One school went without a principal for two months. Evans increased the size of special education classes in a sordid effort to close the budget deficit.

The superintendent selection process is starting to look like an impending train crash. It’s not too late for the Special Administrative Board to put on the brakes, suck in their pride, and ask former superintendent Diana Bourisaw to come back. This district cannot afford another failed experiment leaving more human and financial casualties in its wake. Our children deserve better.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

(2) comments

anonymous

Jamala,I agree with this article 110%. Like, Phyllis, I watched these 3 "characters" on tv and I also read their bio' s on SLPS website. My question was and still is "where is the longevity"? No one seems to stay in one place for long. No committment what-so-ever. After reading their bio's I started thinking about the problems with hiring & keeping superintendents, I became curious. I wondered if St. Louis MO was the only city having this problem. I came across the article below which started me to wondering, is this the same issue in all the cases. If your schedule permits and you don't mind. Could you read this article and let me know if we are in the same boat. If our situation is totally different. Could someone to shed some light on it for me. I just can't understand why it's so find and keep a good superintendent. superintIcommentslovarticlehttp://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/366977_focus15.html.

anonymous

Sista jamala, shame on you.Bourisaw has a melatonin deficiency that prohibits her from serving as superintendent.Can't have that!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.