“font-family: Verdana; line-height: 13px;”>It’s supremely galling.

It’s unbalanced, unfair and mostly unwise. For President Obama and

the Democratic Party, it’s a comprehensive defeat. But it’s not the

end of the world.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>The

deal struck Sunday to free the U.S. economy from its Republican

hostage-takers is impossible for progressives to love. It gets all

the big things wrong, starting with the most fundamental: Obama

never should have acquiesced in linking a routine hike in the debt

ceiling – necessary to pay bills Congress has already incurred –

with all the difficult spending questions that should be dealt with

in the budget process.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Obama’s

starting point was a demand for a “clean,” unencumbered bill to

raise the ceiling; House Speaker John Boehner said no. What would

have happened if Obama refused to budge? We don’t know because

that’s not his style. It would be nice, someday, to find

out.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Once

this became a debate about debt reduction and national priorities,

it was obvious that budget cuts needed to be matched by new

revenue. After all, if you look at historical norms, spending is

too high and tax receipts are too low by about the same amount.

Obama commandeered the bully pulpit and demanded a “balanced

approach” that included revenue. He inveighed against undertaxed

“millionaires and billionaires” who fly around in corporate jets.

Polls showed that by a considerable margin, the public

agreed.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Republicans

insisted on budget cuts only, with not a cent of new revenue – and

that, ladies and gentlemen, is what they got.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>This

isn’t a rout, however. It’s a retreat that leaves Democrats

provisioned for the battles to come.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>The

White House agreed to $900 billion in budget cuts over 10 years –

in the absence of new tax revenue, a galling surrender. But the

deal is structured so the slicing and dicing does not really begin

until the 2013 fiscal year, which gives the struggling economy some

time to find its feet.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>The

cuts exempt Medicaid and other programs for the poor – although

there is no provision for extending unemployment benefits, a

serious defect. And the cuts do not touch Medicare benefits, which

preserves a key Democratic campaign issue: the Republican plan to

turn Medicare into a voucher program that would leave seniors at

the mercy of the private health insurance market.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Even

more significant is that $350 billion of the 10-year cuts – about

40 percent – are in defense spending. Bringing the gargantuan

Pentagon budget under control would be a major step toward putting

the nation on sounder financial footing. This is the one big

conceptual breakthrough that the deal represents: Republicans

abandoned the position that defense spending must not be considered

“discretionary.”

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Through

absurdly complicated procedures, the agreement ensures that Obama

will not face another fight over the debt ceiling before next

year’s election. For this, we can all be grateful.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>That’s

pretty much it, in terms of not-so-bad news.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Obama

tried, and failed, to shake Republicans out of their fevered dream

that the $14.3 trillion national debt can be brought under control

with budget cuts only. Indeed, the tea party zealots who cowed the

party into rejecting all proposals for new revenue will only feel

emboldened, not just in their anti-tax fantasy but in their

technique of threatening to wreck the economy if they don’t get

their way.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>The

agreement creates a 12-member bipartisan “super committee” of

Congress that is supposed to tackle debt reduction broadly, looking

not just at further cuts but at increased tax revenue as well –

despite Boehner’s specious claim that taxes are off the table. No

one knows whether this new body will be able to function. If it

can’t, a “trigger” mechanism starts slashing through the

budget.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Overall,

this is a bad deal that is made considerably less bad by the way

its details are engineered. That’s still a long way from

good.

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Progressives

lost this battle. They retain the capacity to win the next one, if

they are smarter and tougher. If they fight.

“mso-bidi-font-style: normal;”>

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Eugene

Robinson’s email address is

eugenerobinson@washpost.com.

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>

“font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”> 

   

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *