Tishaura O. Jones

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Missouri

was the

27th state to pass charter school legislation in 1998.

In other states, charter school legislation was passed to expand

opportunities for teacher creativity and increase student

achievement. Other states passed it to offer an alternative to

pending voucher legislation.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>However, Missouri’s

reasons were clear: charter schools were another option for public

education, as three decades of court-ordered school desegregation

in St. Louis and Kansas City were coming to an end.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>However, the original

1998 legislation failed to include accountability and transparency

measures for both sponsors and charter schools. The purpose of

House Bill 473 is quite simple: to increase accountability and

transparency, while simultaneously expanding access to make sure

that all of Missouri’s children have a chance at a quality

education and a chance to succeed.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>According to the

September 2010 data from the Missouri Department of Elementary and

Secondary Education, there are 20 unaccredited or provisionally

accredited school districts in the state. Jennings and Normandy

would be unaccredited, and Hazelwood, Ferguson-Florissant and

University City would be provisionally accredited. The remaining

districts in question are in other, non-urban counties.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>This isn’t just an urban

issue, it’s a statewide issue. It’s our responsibility to give

parents an option if their local school districts are failing. If

we do nothing, or if we only focus on Kansas City and St. Louis,

Missouri will be outcompeted, nationally and globally.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>This bill seeks to both

improve the quality of charter schools by increasing accountability

and requiring that failing charter schools are closed if they are

not meeting established benchmarks in academic and operational

performance.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>St. Louis

city charter

schools performed worse overall in math proficiency in 2010 than

St. Louis Public Schools. However, there are some outstanding

charter schools that performed well above the district and state

average. Schools such as City Garden Montessori Charter and

Confluence Preparatory Academy performed at or above the state

standard in math proficiency for 2010. The state standard is more

than double the current SLPS standard in math

proficiency.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Furthermore, out of the

14 St. Louis charter schools, a majority performed at higher levels

in math proficiency than the SLPS average. This proves that charter

schools have the potential to be well run and accountable and to

effectively tailor their curriculum to the students they

serve.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>House Bill 473 seeks to

make quality charter schools the standard, while making it easier

to close underperforming schools through more advanced

accountability measures. This bill would force these

underperforming schools to either reach or exceed the standards set

forth by the bill or close their doors, ensuring that only charter

schools that stand to benefit children academically will remain

open.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Regardless of the

statistics, students and parents have been voting with their feet.

Charter school enrollment in St. Louis has grown approximately 75

percent since 2007, showing that, when given a choice, students and

parents believe that charter schools give them an opportunity for a

quality education. House Bill 473 and expanding access to charter

schools comes down to one issue: giving children the opportunity to

succeed by empowering families to make choices concerning

education.  

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Let me also make it

clear that I applaud the efforts of Superintendent Kelvin Adams and

the SLPS Special Administrative Board. Their progress is clearly

tied to operational stability in the district. However, students in

unaccredited and provisionally accredited school districts do not

have the luxury of waiting until the system is fixed. Do not let

the desire for a perfect bill be the enemy of good legislation.

Let’s expand charter schools and give our students a fair chance at

succeeding in the future.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal;”>

“mso-bidi-font-style: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Jones represents

District 63 in the Missouri House of Representatives, which covers

parts of the city of St. Louis

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *