NNPA Columnist George E Curry
Despite eating chicken in Selma, Ala. and making the rounds of the NAACP and National Urban League conventions, John McCain is backing a Ward Connerly-sponsored ballot initiative that would ban affirmative action in Arizona.
The presumptive Republican nominee for president disclosed his position under questioning recently on ABC-TV’s “This Week with George Stephanopolos.”
STEPHANOPOULOS: Opponents of affirmative action are trying to get a referendum on the ballot here that would do away with affirmative action. Do you support that?
MCCAIN: Yes, I do. I do not believe in quotas. But I have not seen the details of some of these proposals. But I’ve always opposed quotas.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But the one here in Arizona you support.
MCCAIN: I support it, yes.
Obviously, John McCain is ignorant about affirmative action. If he weren’t, he’d know that the concept of affirmative action does include quotas. In fact, Executive Order 11246 outlawing discrimination in federal contracting forbids the use of quotas in affirmative action programs. The original order was issued by President Johnson in 1965 and extended by every subsequent president, including Ronald Reagan and Bush I and II.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights defines affirmative action as ”a contemporary term that encompasses any measure, beyond simple termination of a discriminatory practice, which permits the consideration of race, national origin, sex and disability, along with other criteria, and which is adopted to provide opportunities to a class of qualified individuals who have either historically or actually been denied those opportunities, and to prevent the reoccurrence of discrimination in the future.”
That’s a long way of saying that race, national origin, sex and disability are allowed to be considered along with other factors when looking at qualified candidates for jobs and government contracts. That’s what John McCain is opposing.
Barack Obama was quick to note the contrast in his position.
Addressing a conference of journalists of color in Chicago recently, Obama said: ”I am a strong supporter of affirmative action when properly structured so that it is not a quota, but it is acknowledging and taking into account some of the hardships and difficulties that communities of color may have experienced, continue to experience, and it also speaks to the value of diversity in all walks of American life.”
Interestingly, opponents of affirmative action are trying to use Obama’s political success as an argument for eliminating affirmative action. In March, Newsweek magazine, under the headline, “Obama’s Postracial Test,” asked: “How will the Democratic candidate deal with potentially divisive ballot initiatives calling for an end to affirmative action?”
The story said, “The next test of Barack Obama’s ‘postracial’ persona may come from some unlikely places: Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma. That’s where Ward Connerly, the country’s most innovative and successful opponent of affirmative action over the past decade, is launching an effort to get an initiative on the ballots that would prohibit public institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity in areas such as hiring and college admissions.”
Even with affirmative action, there is not a level playing field.
The National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium reports that although white men make up only 48 percent of the college-educated workforce, they hold 85 percent of the tenured college faculty positions, 86 percent of law firm partnerships, more than 90 percent of the top jobs in the news media, and 96 percent of CEO positions.
The number of Fortune 500 black CEOs fell from seven in 2007 to five in 2008. If African Americans were represented among the CEO ranks in the same proportion they are in the population, there would be 63 black CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, not five.
Most black CEOs and other top achievers readily acknowledge that they rose to the top, in part, because affirmative action provided them an opportunity to demonstrate their skills.