“font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px; line-height: 14px;”>In this

business, all of the people do not always agree with you. Last week

the EYE cast doubt on a plan to reduce the number of state

representatives in the Missouri House of Representatives, and on

politics in the Northeast

“mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;”>Ambulance and Fire Protection

District in connection to its running a third ambulance. Not all of

the people agreed with us.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>The

Missouri Secretary of State now has approved ballot language for a

petition to reduce the number of state representatives from 163 to

103. If the initiative gets on the ballot and is approved, it would

go into effect in 2020 for elections in 2022. Note that the timing

is calculated so as not to threaten the political pork chops of the

people currently serving in the House, which is a tacit admission

that the proposal is threatening. According to a Democratic

consultant working on the proposal, however, the process is not

equivalent to “shooting donkeys” (eliminating Democrats), as the

EYE suggested.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>He

argues that reducing the number of state representatives would

produce representatives who would be forced to look at issues from

a much broader perspective if their districts were larger and more

diverse. Currently, except for a very few districts, most of the

state House districts are either urban or rural. Reducing the

number of districts would create districts with more diverse

demographics.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>He

also argues that a smaller number of more diverse districts would

increase the influence of the urban areas of the state. Urban areas

now produce more than 60 percent of the tax revenue in Missouri but

receive less that 40 percent of the representation in the state

House.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>There

is also a strong fiscal argument for reducing the number of state

representatives. Currently, the annual salaries and per diem costs

for 163 state representatives is some $4.6 million. The estimated

annual savings if the number of state representatives were reduced

to 103 would be more than $2.5 million.

“mso-spacerun: yes;”> 

These savings do not include other

costs like employer taxes, pension and health benefits, or the cost

of office operations and space.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>Currently

there is one state representative for every 36,734 people in

Missouri. Compared to other states with similar population,

Tennessee has a population of 6,296,254 and 66 state

representatives, which translates to a ratio of 78,174 people per

representative – more than twice as many as in Missouri. Indiana

has a population of 6,080,485 and 100 state representatives, or

60,805 people per reps. In Illinois, which has a population of

12,910,409, there are 118 state representatives – that’s 109,410

people per state reps, very nearly three times as many as in

Missouri.

“font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Verdana;”>In

most statewide elections in Missouri, there are seven counties that

outvote the other 114 counties. All of these counties are in urban

areas. This is why Democrats often are able to win statewide and

control the executive branch of government and at least one of the

state’s seats in the U.S. Senate. Reducing the number of state

representative districts would help to bring more balance to the

state Legislature – it would bring the political balance of the

state House closer to the political balance in the state’s

population. This, the Democratic consultant maintains, would be

good for

Democrats.

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family:”>

Ambulances and money

“font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px;”> 

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

As for the

Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District, the fire board’s

chairman Derek

Mays raised some objections to last week’s coverage in the

EYE. He framed his complaint with the acknowledgement that the

piece was “an op-ed, not necessarily to be viewed as a normal

article premised on journalistic investigation.” We corrected him

on that point, as the piece was in fact reported and the district

was given an opportunity to share its side. Chief Medical Officer

Ken Farwell

told our reporter

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>Rebecca Rivas

that he had

been told not to talk to her, and Acting Fire Chief

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>Bilal Olushola

responded

after deadline, despite repeated calls. We can’t report what we are

not told on time.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

Now Mays is

telling us “our district was on a path to incur a $900,000 loss as

of last February. After restructuring, job eliminations, salary

reductions and penny-pinching we still ended the year with a

$115,000 loss. When we ran a third ambulance at the end of 2009 and

the beginning of 2010, we averaged 1.3 calls with that ambulance

per day. In rough math, running these calls would generate a bit

less than $9,000 per month on average as a result of insurance

billings we would receive. However, to run an ambulance in terms of

staffing and vehicle costs the district incurs over $31,000 per

month. In other words, to continue running a third ambulance with

the current call level would cost the district $22,000 additional

per month or more, which equates to more than $250,000 additional

loss for the year. That simply would be unsustainable for our

district at this point.”

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>The American

will revisit

these numbers in a future edition.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

Mays added:

“Further, it is deeply offensive to many in our district that the

tragic incident of

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>Scherese Bishop

be used to

suggest a third ambulance is desperately needed for our residents.

The University City ambulance called to assist arrived on the scene

to transport Scherese

“mso-bidi-font-style: normal;”>

“mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;”>before

she was ready to

be transported to the hospital. Regardless of the proximity of our

fire house to the scene there would not have been any difference in

transport time from the time of the incident to Scherese’s arrival

at the hospital.”

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

This

account, too, merits further investigation.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

Tragically,

district paramedic Scherese Bishop has since died, elevating the

stakes on this incident a great deal. See the story on Page

A1.

“font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px;”> 

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Show-Me

vacancy

“mso-bidi-font-style: normal;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”> 

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>The American

was given a

sneak preview of the Show-Me Institute’s forthcoming study on the

City of St. Louis’ reluctance to sell its vacant land to willing

buyers. It is an inspired piece of nitty-gritty research that asks

a number of questions that needed to be asked and will force city

officials to formulate and defend their redevelopment

policy.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

Under the

assumption that every Show-Me Institute study is a knife intended

for somebody’s back, the intended victim of this study would appear

to be Paul McKee

Jr. and his Northside Regeneration project. If so, Show-Me

man Rex

Sinquefield may be disappointed. He may find that McKee is

one of the many willing buyers lined up to buy city land and ready

to pay. Getting the city off the dime on the vacant land it is

holding may help, not hurt, McKee.

“margin-bottom: .0001pt; line-height: normal; mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;”>

Also, it is

possible that the study already can count one political corpse in

former city development director

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>Barb Geisman

, who left her

post after Show-Me researcher

“mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;”>Audrey Spalding

began

gathering the data that will be reported in the study.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *