“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
“font-family: Verdana; font-size: 9pt; background-color: white;”>The Jeremy Lin phenomenon continues, and what a ride it has been so far. No one has gotten off to a start like Lin. No Asian, black, white or any other nationality has put these numbers up, the world is embracing it unlike anything we have seen in sports and he is taking it all in stride. With the stride has come a step into political correctness that has to be enforced.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
In case you
have not heard, the two-headed monster of racism and failed comedy
has again resurfaced.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Over the
weekend ESPN fired a copy editor for its website for posting the
headline “Chink in the Armor” after the Knicks’ first loss with Lin
as a starter. Yep, he is done as dinner. Another broadcaster was
suspended for using the same term on the air.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
It did not take
ESPN long to know that they had people who stepped in it, and they
acted swiftly. Another sensitivity training session for someone
gone awry. Here is the bigger issue. The rush to defense by other
media members who barely know the situation, yet try to defend
these actions by the individuals who have been
disciplined.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Even some local
talk show hosts stated that there was some overreacting to what
happened. As if it was all good, especially because it did not
effect their ethnic crew. That is the problem.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
“You could tell
that they meant no malice in their statement,” one said. Another
went on to say, “Political correctness has gone too
far.”
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Really? How can
you tell, so I can be on the lookout next time? Explain to me where
the politically correct line should be drawn so those who have been
disparaged should know how it works.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Better yet,
give me a break. The callous, disrespectful manner in which some
carry on with issues of this nature, with everything being for
comedic effect, is par for the course, as it never hits most sports
media close to home. Maybe it should.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
No this is not
a black man overacting because one of his own has been made fun of.
It is again the same old story of some guys sitting in the newsroom
with nothing else to do but try and amuse each other when they are
not sizing up the females in the work environment, which leads to
the sexual harassment allegations that our industry has been known
to endure, from time to time.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Funny, he he,
ha ha!
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
While I
understand that this is a serious offense, all parties involved
have done the right thing. Lin has moved on, both individuals have
apologized, with one pointing out that his wife is
Asian.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Great, so where
should the line be drawn? What should the penalty be for being
politically incorrect? Firing a person is a serious offense. It is
a statement by an employer and a label by that individual who is
terminated that is at times hard to shake when it comes to finding
the next job.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
So is there
middle ground? Yes.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
Here is how it
should work. As part of orientation, a new employee should go
through a sensitivity training program that is as mandatory drug
testing. Skirting the issue would prevent that employee from being
hired. No if’s ands or buts.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
If that
employee crosses the line then he is not fired for his remarks, he
is fired for stupidity and wasting the company’s time as they put
him or her through the program and they are too dumb to follow
direction. Adios.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
If there is no
program in place that individual should get a month off and also
while they are off they should attend training to that effect. They
should also be required to go into a school and talk about their
experience and hopefully save a future moron from committing such
an asinine act.
“margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”>
The media
industry has to be better when it comes to this, as they are the
eyes and ears for the public. Yes, there should be a greater
accountability. As for stupidity, that is an age-old search for the
cure to that.
