“font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13px;”>The census data released

at the end of February provided a bitter pill for anyone concerned

with our city’s future. The exodus of almost 30,000 residents from

St. Louis over the past 10 years continued our staggering

population decline into its sixth consecutive decade.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>In response, elected

officials, concerned citizens and the media have renewed their

calls for a substantial “rethinking” of regional government – like

merging St. Louis city and county. On April 5, however, local

voters will take on an issue just as important to the long-term

health of our city when they consider whether to continue the city

earning tax with Proposition E.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Every year, the earnings

tax provides about $141 million in St. Louis. That’s roughly

one-third of our city’s annual revenue. It helps pay for many of

our most essential services, like picking up trash and public

safety.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>But if voters fail to

approve Prop E, the city will no longer collect those funds –

forcing us to find new ways to pay for these services or lose them

entirely. And it’s not just city programs that would disappear. The

cutbacks in services and quality of life would make St. Louis less

attractive to businesses and individuals. That means countless

numbers of the city’s companies and residents would leave the area,

taking tax dollars with them.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Our city just

experienced a substantial population drop after 10 years of

relatively significant investment and effort focused on

revitalizing our city. Imagine how far St. Louis’ population might

fall by 2020 if we’re forced to slash basic services.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>When the State Auditor’s

Office examined the earnings tax last year, it estimated that

eliminating it could reduce the city’s businesses and population by

10 percent. Such a decline would cost St. Louis another $31 million

in tax revenues and, combined with the lost earnings tax, would

decrease the city’s general budget by 47 percent. According to the

report, these diminished revenues would eliminate more than 2,000

city jobs and “be so disastrous that they would result in the

City’s ruin.”

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>You can envision how

life in St. Louis would change if we lost half the city’s budget.

We’d have trash pickup every 14 days, instead of once a week. We’d

have our streets cleaned half as often as we do now. And we’d have

half as many police and emergency personnel in a city already

plagued by high levels of crime and violence.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Eliminating the earnings

tax would be a giant step back at a time we’re desperately trying

to move forward. Just being required to reauthorize it every five

years costs St. Louis funds that would be better spent elsewhere.

Because uncertain revenue streams make lenders uneasy about risking

their funds, it’ll be more expensive for our city to get the loans

it needs and any bonds we issue will be worth less than they

otherwise would.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Later this month, Kansas

City plans to issue $55.3 million in general-obligation bonds to

pay for capital improvements and refinance existing debt. However,

in February, a bond rating service lowered Kansas City’s rating

one-notch to AA. In a memo to its investors, the ratings service

cited the risk posed by holding earnings tax referendums every five

years as the sole reason for the downgrade. Over the next 25 years,

this drop will cost the city about $400,000 in their new bonds’

value.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>Such damages will almost

surely come St. Louis’ way, too, in the near future. And, if voters

fail to pass Prop E, this doubt and insecurity will handcuff our

city even further for years to come.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>By passing Prop E, we’ll

send a loud and clear message that we want to move St. Louis

forward, not backward. And a large margin of victory will let bond

raters, civic leaders and “retired financiers” know that our city’s

most important source of funding is safe for years to

come.

“font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;”>So, join me and

countless others committed to our city’s future by visiting the

CitizensforAStrongerStLouis.com and adding your name to the list of

citizen supporters. Spread the word and tell your friends and

neighbors why Prop E is so vital to keeping our city

going.  Most importantly,

remember to get out there and vote YES ON PROP E on April

5.  

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *